Table of contents
Open Table of contents
Background
In the world of software engineering, control and autonomy are not just beneficial; they’re essential. Whether it’s in the realm of cloud networking or backlog management, it’s paramount that the teams responsible for outcomes maintain foundational control over their implementations. Here’s a closer look at why.
The Perils of External Control on Foundations
Every structure, be it a physical building or a software application, stands strong due to its foundation. If another group controls this foundation, the repercussions can be severe.
Case: IT Managing Cloud Networking Instead of Engineering Teams
- Adaptability Challenges: Engineering is about innovation and quick adaptation. When IT manages cloud networking, the agility to respond to changes is compromised. Engineering teams become limited by the pace and mindset of external groups, which might not be attuned to the pressing demands of development environments.
- Process Overhead: Another team’s overbearing processes can slow down engineering operations. What might be routine for IT can be a cumbersome addition to an engineer’s workflow.
- Shared Bottlenecks: Relinquishing control means inheriting challenges. The bottlenecks of the IT team, in terms of bandwidth, priority, or resources, directly impact the engineering team’s velocity and efficiency.
Autonomy in Backlog Management
Engineering teams’ prowess is not just in their technical skills, but also in their grasp of the product’s nuances, requirements, and potential pitfalls.
The Detriment of Externally Managed Backlogs
- Technical Debt Accumulation: When backlogs are steered by non-technical groups, they often miss out on the importance of addressing technical debt. The focus shifts to features and immediate deliverables, sidelining the essential maintenance tasks. This neglect, over time, leads to an accumulation of technical debt, making systems fragile, slow, and unreliable.
- The Business Cost of Ignoring Technical Debt: While the repercussions might not be immediate, over years, the compounded technical debt can cripple business operations. Systems become harder to maintain, innovate upon, or even integrate with – all leading to reduced competitive advantage and potential business loss.
The Need for Engineering Control
Engineers are the guardians of their products. They have the clearest understanding of its architecture, strengths, and vulnerabilities. When held accountable for their product’s performance, reliability, and scalability, it’s only fair that they control what they work on. They need the autonomy to prioritize tasks, address vulnerabilities, and ensure the product’s health and longevity.
In Conclusion
Control in software engineering is not about power but about responsibility. When engineering teams have a say in their foundational tools and prioritize their tasks, they can effectively safeguard, nurture, and innovate their products. As technology landscapes become more intricate, the need for foundational control becomes even more crucial. Organizations must recognize this and empower their engineering teams to lead from the front, ensuring product robustness and business continuity.